JOINT APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS UNDER ORDER 1 RULE 10 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 TO BE FILED BEFORE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SEEKING DIRECTIONS FOR IMPLEADMENT OF TWO ADDITIONAL PROPOSED RESPONDENTS AS NECESSARY PARTIES AND WITH FURTHER APPROPRIATE DIRECTION TO THE ADDITIONAL TWO PROPOSED RESPONDENTS TO REMOVE/DELETE ALL WEB POSTINGS / BLOGS / YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS SHOWN IN ANNEXURE ATTACHED WITH CONSENT TERMS AND AMENDED/MODIFIED CONSENT TERMS.




OR

 

 

 

 

NAME

MOBILE NO.

E-MAIL I’D

RANJEET KUMAR

8383098478, 9667769795

rk@courtkutchehry.com

JAI THAKUR

8130703334, 9355723300

jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com

RAJEEV RANJAN

9334553249

rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com

ASHOK MISHRA

9718327746

sales@courtkutchehry.com

RAVI KUMAR


ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

JOINT APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SEEKING APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED RESPONDENTS TO REMOVE/DELETE ALL WEB POSTINGS / BLOGS / YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS SHOWN IN THE ANNEXURE ATTACHED WITH CONSENT TERMS / AMENDED/ MODIFIED CONSENT TERMS.

Image
JOINT APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENTS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA SEEKING APPROPRIATE DIRECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED RESPONDENTS TO REMOVE/DELETE ALL WEB POSTINGS / BLOGS / YOUTUBE VIDEOS AS SHOWN IN THE ANNEXURE ATTACHED WITH CONSENT TERMS / AMENDED/ MODIFIED CONSENT TERMS. OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@courtkutchehry.com JAI THAKUR 8130703334 ,  9355723300 jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com RAJEEV   RANJAN 9334553249 rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com ASHOK   MISHRA 9718327746 sales@courtkutchehry.com RAVI   KUMAR ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com
Read more

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS IN SLP (CRL) TO BE FILED BEFORE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN ABOVE NOTED SLP (CRL) SEEKING VACATION OF STAY GRANTED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT VIDE ITS EARLIER ORDER AS BY PREFERRING THE INSTANT SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION, THE PETITIONERS ARE SEEKING TO INVITE A FINDING WHICH SHALL BE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THREE SEPARATE ORDERS ALREADY PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE APEX COURT IN ALREADY DISPOSED OFF BATCH OF BUNCH SLP CRL’S WHEREBY THIS HON’BLE COURT HAD UPHELD A BATCH OF BUNCH COGNIZANCE AND SUMMONING ORDERS PASSED BY LEARNED CJM (ON THE BASIS OF THE POLICE REPORT FILED UNDER SECTION 173 CR. P.C.), AND THIS HON’BLE COURT HAD ALSO IN THE SAID BATCH OF BUNCH SLP (CRL.) REFUSED TO QUASH THE BATCH OF BUNCH FIRS WHICH WERE REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS UNDER SECTIONS 420, 406, 409, 415, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120B IPC, AT POLICE STATION.

Image
APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS IN SLP (CRL) TO BE FILED BEFORE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN ABOVE NOTED SLP (CRL) SEEKING VACATION OF STAY GRANTED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT VIDE ITS EARLIER ORDER AS BY PREFERRING THE INSTANT SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION, THE PETITIONERS ARE SEEKING TO INVITE A FINDING WHICH SHALL BE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH THREE SEPARATE ORDERS ALREADY PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE APEX COURT IN ALREADY DISPOSED OFF BATCH OF BUNCH SLP CRL’S WHEREBY  THIS HON’BLE COURT HAD UPHELD A BATCH OF BUNCH COGNIZANCE AND SUMMONING ORDERS PASSED BY LEARNED CJM (ON THE BASIS OF THE POLICE REPORT FILED UNDER SECTION 173 CR. P.C.), AND THIS HON’BLE COURT HAD ALSO IN THE SAID BATCH OF BUNCH SLP (CRL.) REFUSED TO QUASH THE BATCH OF BUNCH FIRS WHICH WERE REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS UNDER SECTIONS 420, 406, 409, 415, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120B IPC, AT POLICE STATION. OR         NAME MOBILE NO. E-MAIL I’D RANJEET   KUMAR 8383098478 ,  9667769795 rk@cour...
Read more